There is 3D evidence that babies feel pain and gruesome stories from medics of what it is actually like to pull a 24 week baby out of a mother's womb and kill it – and yet still Gordon Brown, refused to support a reduction in the age limit of abortions and now gloats over the failure of the amendment to bring the limit down. Why? Because he is a 1970's socialist and the absolute mantra for a committed left-winger on the issue of abortion in that supposedly radical but sad decade was that a woman had an absolute right over what happened to their own bodies,as well as the other individual within their womb. So whatever evidence comes in front of Gordon Brown and his secular colleagues, they cannot bring themselves to demolish an icon that inspired them in the days of their youth.
The sad irony of all this is that while Gordon Brown's first specialist subject was History, he can not see the larger historical forces working on him. He is simply being swept along by all the half baked ideals that filled smoked filled Junior Common Rooms in the Seventies. Those ideals dreamed of creating a fairer world, but just as the early Christian Socialism of Keir Hardie later got enmeshed with atheistic Marxism, so too the idealism of the left in the Sixties married itself heart and soul to a strident anti establishment secularism that had no room for Christianity. This was because Christianity, as caricatured in simplistic films like 'If', was perceived to be part and parcel of a hypocritical establishment that according to the wise young men of the universities had brought about the havoc of two world wars and the seemingly appalling gap between rich and poor. Capitalism and religion belonged together, so in the new utopia planned by Gordon Brown and his fellow socialists, religion would have to take a back seat. A part of the perceived oppressiveness of Christianity was against women. It was a paternalistic faith, wanting to keep the woman at home and inferior to men. And so chorused along by the hedonistic voices of the time. the right for a woman to an abortion became a part of the creed for all those who wanted to remove this terrible Christian establishment.
Very conveniently for these young men their campaign against oppressive Christianity meant they could also attack Christian teaching on sex. The left-winger was very concerned by the poor – and would patronisingly pat the church on the back for its record of aid – but he had no time at all for the church's teaching that casual sex was wrong. Back in history honest sinners have enjoyed sex without commitment, but have known it wasn't very honourable. But now it was all a part of tearing up the establishment that had caused such apparent oppression. To be sexually prolificand uncommital was to be 'liberal'. And if the lust led to unwanted pregnancies – well it was for the woman to decide, for the foetus belongs to her.
The tragedy in all this is that the post-war reaction against the Christian establishment, though understandable, was completely unjustified. Sure there was hypocrisy, but by and large, it was Christianity that had sustained Britain against the Nazis – indeed Churchill had said it was a matter of fighting for 'Christian civilisation'. And yet Gordon Brown's generation was unable to see that in reality the youth movement of the 1960's was essentially shallow and a part of a natural historical reaction to the war years and instead dressed it all up in pseudo philosophising that has unleashed an unprecedented attack on Christian values.
Gordon Brown was very much a part of all this – both at a public and personal level. Publicly he has never condemned the darker aspects of the Freudian pleasure seeking principle of his generation, nor spoken out for Christian family values in the market place. Instead he has simply parroted the mantras of his age which support mindless sex and tragically killing living babies. Privately he is not the son of the Manse he likes to claim he is. Unlike Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair who were both privately practising Christians, Gordon Brown is by design spiritually ambiguous.
Gordon Brown can perhaps be proud of his economic socialism. He has shifted a certain amount of wealth from the rich to the government and some of that has reached the poor. But there is nothing for him to be proud about tonight as he goes to contemplate his victory over those who wanted to bring the age limit of abortion down. Instead he has shown himself to have never matured from the student mantras that demanded in the name of liberal socialism that men have sex, women have abortions, and babies die. T.Hawksley